News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hacker’s Delight (2012) by huqedato on Sunday August 07, 2022 @10:36AM (#32376798)
A fine book with a very misleading name. The book is about basic computer science and algorithms.
Re:Hacker’s Delight (2012) by AlotOfReading on Sunday August 07, 2022 @10:51AM (#32376919)
It's not misleading, it's just an older meaning of the word "hacker" and one that still exists in the name of this site. Hacker's delight is a spiritual successor to the HAKMEM memo from the 70s. Guy Steele even wrote the foreword.
Re:Hacker’s Delight (2012) by SeanLuke on Sunday August 07, 2022 @03:58PM (#32379326)
The term hacker has a long and storied history. A hacker is someone who makes hacks. A hack is a thing, typically a piece of code, which must be appreciated for its aesthetic beauty, regardless of whether it's particularly useful. [This term was obviously originally used sarcastically]. People strove to become hackers. It was a badge of honor.

In the 1980s the term "hacker" was possibly conflated with "cracker" by stupids in the media, and came to mean a software pirate or kid who broke into the Pentagon. But the proper meaning still hasn't been lost with the graybeards among us.

Re:Hacker’s Delight (2012) by xhevahir on Monday August 08, 2022 @01:35AM (#32382630)
> In the 1980s the term "hacker" was possibly conflated with "cracker" by stupids in the media,

I think it's not necessarily due to stupidity that media outlets eschewed the term "cracker."

Re:Hacker’s Delight (2012) by night-rider on Sunday August 07, 2022 @11:51AM (#32377381)
Reminded me of Smokers Delight by Nightmares on Wax: https://www.last.fm/music/Nightmares%20on%20Wax/Smokers%20De...
Re:Hacker’s Delight (2012) by fknorangesite on Sunday August 07, 2022 @12:49PM (#32377814)
And Rapper's Delight before that.
Re:Hacker’s Delight (2012) by sjamaan on Monday August 08, 2022 @04:02AM (#32383305)
And Turkish Delight before that
Re:Hacker’s Delight (2012) by brianrisk on Sunday August 07, 2022 @04:16PM (#32379474)
I hear all of you about how it's not misleading, but I must admit that when I clicked on this link I was expecting a different kind of book.