Ironically, that could at least partially be attributed to their use of "environmentally friendly" plastic with little to no plasticisers.
> I've made AirPods last longer than any other pair of earbuds I've ever had.
same... now if only i could easily replace the batteries, it would be almost perfect (they just die on me mid-call sometimes)We've heard the same argument about phones, and my old Galaxy S5 with a user-replaceable battery was a whopping 0.5 mm thicker than an iPhone 13 mini. That's the width of a mechanical pencil lead. They're both water-resistant, too.
According to google, 0.5 mm = 0.019685 in
Yup. I have a pair of Shure earbuds bought in 2011. When the cable started acting out, I replaced it with a lightning cable, since I had just got an iPhone. When that one started acting out, I replaced it with a Shure BT cable. Now I get great sound from my crappy work laptop.
Would be nice.
- Value per use - Weight (analog for materials used) - Likely lifetime
Bonus for wireless headphones specifically is you can buy replacement cases, or single buds if any go bad.
It's the cord. For me, a max of six months of fiddling with the damn thing and it breaks.
I've had real headphones last quite a bit longer— but I buy the ones with replaceable cords. The pair I still have is on its fourth cord and second pair of muffs.
I don't view it as any sort of economic, human, or environmental catastrophe, that they stop holding a charge after... how long again? I've had a pair of Pros since before the pandemic which seem to hold up fine.
So I'm around what, twenty cents a day? It's a rare day I don't wear them for a solid hour.
It undermines the argument to pick the easy, lazy, and really rather bad example that everyone else flocks to for some bizarre reason. It's genuinely hard to come up with a better product category for glued-in batteries than in-ear wireless headphones.