Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by SiempreViernes on Saturday July 30, 2022 @04:05PM
(#32289816)
I mean, a trillion spent is a trillion spent: it'll trickle down regardless of how you spend it, the question is if you could have spent it some other way that would have given more jobs?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by patmcc on Sunday July 31, 2022 @12:55AM
(#32293285)
A trillion spent building factories, highways, public housing, schools, etc. may employ exactly as many people as a trillion spent building weapons, dropping bombs, and killing people.
What you end up with after spending that trillion is a bit different though.
Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by denton-scratch on Sunday July 31, 2022 @08:37AM
(#32295103)
> it'll trickle down regardless of how you spend it
That's an article of conservative dogma dating from the Reagan and Bush eras, and it's pretty-much discredited now. For most major capital expenditure programmes, the majority of the money trickling down stops trickling once it reaches shareholders and executives.
Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by namdnay on Saturday July 30, 2022 @05:18PM
(#32290436)
It was Bush - if it hadn’t been spent on Iraq it would have gone straight to tax cuts for the upper brackets.
We’re talking about the guy who managed to tank the worlds healthiest budget
Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by MisterMower on Saturday July 30, 2022 @10:18PM
(#32292549)
I thought we were talking a miniature nuclear reactor…
Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by Jenk on Saturday July 30, 2022 @05:59PM
(#32290773)
Not if it is stashed away secretly avoiding tax and other contributions to society.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickallen/2012/07/23/super...