Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by SiempreViernes on Saturday July 30, 2022 @04:05PM
(#32289816)
I mean, a trillion spent is a trillion spent: it'll trickle down regardless of how you spend it, the question is if you could have spent it some other way that would have given more jobs?
Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by patmcc on Sunday July 31, 2022 @12:55AM
(#32293285)
A trillion spent building factories, highways, public housing, schools, etc. may employ exactly as many people as a trillion spent building weapons, dropping bombs, and killing people.
What you end up with after spending that trillion is a bit different though.
Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by denton-scratch on Sunday July 31, 2022 @08:37AM
(#32295103)
> it'll trickle down regardless of how you spend it
That's an article of conservative dogma dating from the Reagan and Bush eras, and it's pretty-much discredited now. For most major capital expenditure programmes, the majority of the money trickling down stops trickling once it reaches shareholders and executives.
Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by namdnay on Saturday July 30, 2022 @05:18PM
(#32290436)
It was Bush - if it hadn’t been spent on Iraq it would have gone straight to tax cuts for the upper brackets.
We’re talking about the guy who managed to tank the worlds healthiest budget
Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by MisterMower on Saturday July 30, 2022 @10:18PM
(#32292549)
I thought we were talking a miniature nuclear reactor…
Re:US regulators will certify first small nuclear reactor de...
by Jenk on Saturday July 30, 2022 @05:59PM
(#32290773)
Not if it is stashed away secretly avoiding tax and other contributions to society.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickallen/2012/07/23/super...
that trillion estimate, one of the lower ones by the way, is a cost figure without the associated profits and revenue. As horrible as it is and was, the 'military industrial complex', as a whole, profited incredibly -- this 'trickled down', a phrase I hate to use , all across the United States in the form of jobs from market players and call-for-bids across the nation to fill in niche topics (like airport security, for example) that were otherwise un-worked beforehand.
Another aside : the proof that airport security has changed anything for the better is scant at best, and corrupt at worst.
tl;dr : if you think any of the wars in the middle east were fought for the sake of 'American Safety', whatever that might be, then you're just not paying enough attention.