Re:House Democrats to propose ban on lawmaker stock trading ...
by paulryanrogers on Thursday July 28, 2022 @01:14PM
(#32267336)
Renting may be a new experience for them. And with such a huge bump in salary I think they can take the hit.
After all it is positioning real estate as investments that contribute to its unaffordability.
Re:House Democrats to propose ban on lawmaker stock trading ...
by rococode on Thursday July 28, 2022 @01:23PM
(#32267495)
That's pretty trivial to work around... you can own one primary residence, and one additional residence in DC. You can't own 10 buildings.
That said, I don't think real estate is as easily abused as stocks. Much harder to influence the value.
Re:House Democrats to propose ban on lawmaker stock trading ...
by vkou on Thursday July 28, 2022 @01:37PM
(#32267688)
> So, they can't own a home in a location they represent?
They could always try renting. A lot of people manage to get by doing just that.
Re:House Democrats to propose ban on lawmaker stock trading ...
by dhritzkiv on Thursday July 28, 2022 @01:13PM
(#32267295)
Many reps do rent in DC, sometimes in frat-house-like conditions with other reps.[1]
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2013/12/04/politics/real-alpha-house/ind...
Re:House Democrats to propose ban on lawmaker stock trading ...
by wyre on Thursday July 28, 2022 @03:12PM
(#32268875)
Why isn’t this the basis for a tv show?
Re:House Democrats to propose ban on lawmaker stock trading ...
by AftHurrahWinch on Thursday July 28, 2022 @05:17PM
(#32270226)
It was, the cartoonist behind Doonesbury did it for 2 years.
So, they can't own a home in a location they represent? I don't see that going over well. Your primary home is real estate. So is that little family cottage.
Also, congressional reps need to have a home is Washington. So, they have to rent there?