You're certainly entitled to that opinion. I can see a counterpoint to it being that there could be value in having an option to ensure they don't have a failed attempt, only to suffer more after.

It's probably better to avoid telling someone they don't really want to do it, and erring on the side of believing they do, even if you think you happen to have evidence to the contrary.

That’s basically how I feel. Suicide is not the ideal outcome for anyone, but nobody can stop somebody from doing it. They already have the option for it, because it’s their “God-given” right to take their own life. So the government does not need to give them this option. And it cannot prohibit it. Assuming the government wants to “do something” about it, that leaves them with two possible policies: facilitate it or mitigate it.

In my opinion, mitigating it is the clearly correct choice, because facilitating it would lead to suicides of people who would counterfactually eventually regret it. Whereas mitigating it would at least lead to “false positives” that are failures to prevent someone from suicide, rather than failures to save someone from it.

You evidently have strongly held opinions about something you know very little.

They might want to have official support / professional support to do it proper and not somehow.

Right now this option is blocked by governments around the world.

And due to the problem, that the government can't just legalize it without save guard around it, this makes a quite good case that there has to be some government involvement.

It's really hard to override the innate biological need to live. I have a lot of respect for those who have the force of will to actually pull it off. Even if your life is full of nothing but misery it is hard to actually do.

What if they're so sick they're literally incapable of holding someone's hand?