Re:JCOF: JSON-like Compact Object Format
by linker3000 on Friday July 15, 2022 @12:57PM
(#32110218)
Slight awkwardness with the spoken pronunciation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:JCOF: JSON-like Compact Object Format
by taddevries on Friday July 15, 2022 @01:02PM
(#32110285)
Glad I'm not the only one who reads it that way.
Re:JCOF: JSON-like Compact Object Format
by jsiaajdsdaa on Friday July 15, 2022 @01:14PM
(#32110459)
J cough?
Re:JCOF: JSON-like Compact Object Format
by HelloNurse on Friday July 15, 2022 @01:18PM
(#32110521)
Jack off, I'm afraid.
Re:JCOF: JSON-like Compact Object Format
by jsiaajdsdaa on Friday July 15, 2022 @01:41PM
(#32110800)
Interesting, I wonder which type of English speakers would see that as their initial hunch for pronunciation.
While Oscar Wilde would undoubtedly have something witty to say about that, I guess it's a matter of stress: if you read it as a word and assume stress on the (invisible) first vowel, it's almost inevitable: juh-cof.
Re:JCOF: JSON-like Compact Object Format
by jsiaajdsdaa on Friday July 15, 2022 @02:02PM
(#32111044)
But we dont say juh sahn for JSON? Hence why Jcough seemed intuitive.
Language is not very deterministic. An unknown word can remind you of more than one other word, which can influence the way you pronounce it, certainly in English where pronunciation is so irregular. That’s not a fact of course, just a possible factor.
Re:JCOF: JSON-like Compact Object Format
by beepbooptheory on Saturday July 16, 2022 @12:17AM
(#32115183)
Guess you could say if its a 'jack off' here, its 'jiss on' there.
Re:JCOF: JSON-like Compact Object Format
by HelloNurse on Saturday July 16, 2022 @10:46AM
(#32118671)
There is a very, very small difference between placing a slight break in the middle of the acronym as J-COF or as JC-OF, because there's a major unwritten vowel sound after J in any case.