Re:Gmail users “hard pass” on plan to let political emails b...
by throwuxiytayq on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @08:39AM
(#32081795)
Having jumped off the Gmail boat recently, as well as a couple other Gboats, reading news about Google has become a much more pleasant experience. I wholeheartedly recommend it to anyone who gets unnecessary stress from stuff like this.
Re:Gmail users “hard pass” on plan to let political emails b...
by throwuxiytayq on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @01:08PM
(#32085588)
Two frequently mentioned alternatives are Protonmail and Fastmail. I can personally recommend the former - free to test, imports history from Gmail, vastly more secure, UI is pretty nice if a bit slow (but I'll take the E2EE as an excuse).
Re:Gmail users “hard pass” on plan to let political emails b...
by okamiueru on Thursday July 14, 2022 @05:48AM
(#32093940)
What's the ussje with the calendar? How Google parses your email and creates events is convenient, but fair enough. Perhaps the ability to easily share calendars with others? What are some things you are wishing it had?
Re:Gmail users “hard pass” on plan to let political emails b...
by mpalmer on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @08:29AM
(#32081706)
This is totally backwards. The orgs that craft political emails should be incentivized to create emails that are _less likely_ to be marked as spam. Exempting them all but guarantees the spamminess of these emails will get worse!
Re:Gmail users “hard pass” on plan to let political emails b...
by nunez on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @10:31AM
(#32083292)
Honestly, if you read the notice [1] their legal team sent to the FCC, it just sounds like a manual process for verifying an email address as not spam that people can still one-click unsubscribe from/mark as spam. The emails would still be scanned for spam and bounced if they are spammy, at least according to the notice.
Re:Gmail users “hard pass” on plan to let political emails b...
by dingosity on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @12:25PM
(#32084889)
Hmm. I pay $6 (or is it $10?) per month for an account that's supposed to have spam filtering turned on. GMail already allows recruiters to bypass filters; at some point you have to ask "What's the point of paying for a Google Workspace / Apps / G Suite account, if you don't get basic account services?"
To be fair, the GMail interface is largely drama-free and it's served our business well for the last couple of years. But it's very clear we're not Google's customer here (even though we pay a small fee to use the service.) That doesn't make me feel very good about Alphabet / Google.
Re:Gmail users “hard pass” on plan to let political emails b...
by mesozoic on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @10:29AM
(#32083264)
So you're saying all I have to do is register to run for some office if I want to send as much spam as I want. Please elect me Mr. Diet Pills for Free running for your local sewage administrator.
Re:Gmail users “hard pass” on plan to let political emails b...
by marssaxman on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @03:04PM
(#32087339)
Washington State used to have a persistent political candidate named "Mike the Mover". In 20 years of campaigning, he never won a race - but he claimed that each $1500 filing fee bought him $150k worth of advertising.
Re:Gmail users “hard pass” on plan to let political emails b...
by RugnirViking on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @09:00AM
(#32082011)
Interesting. seems like there is some conflict. I got the number from reading the emails that were already sent, several of which were replies to an email from the FEC reading (among other things):
"The Commission will accept written comments on the request during the 10-day period
following the publication of the request (no later than July 11) and must issue a response no
later than 60 days after the receipt of the complete advisory opinion request, that is, by August
30, 2022."
If you feel strongly about this, email anyway. Not like they can complain about spam ;)
It doesn't seem like anything users would notice.
[1] https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/2022-14/202214R_1.pdf
Now it’s up to each user to mark the email as spam / click unsubscribe.
To be fair, the GMail interface is largely drama-free and it's served our business well for the last couple of years. But it's very clear we're not Google's customer here (even though we pay a small fee to use the service.) That doesn't make me feel very good about Alphabet / Google.
https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/11/24241910/this-is-how-you...
The deadline for this one was 11th july sadly.
"The Commission will accept written comments on the request during the 10-day period following the publication of the request (no later than July 11) and must issue a response no later than 60 days after the receipt of the complete advisory opinion request, that is, by August 30, 2022."
If you feel strongly about this, email anyway. Not like they can complain about spam ;)