As TikTok grows, so does suspicion

Re:As TikTok grows, so does suspicion by trasz on Monday July 11, 2022 @04:04AM (#32053481)

Not really - they differ in rhetorics, but not in things that matter. Democrats hadn’t denounced any part of religious fundamentalism, for example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:As TikTok grows, so does suspicion by ceejayoz on Monday July 11, 2022 @09:14AM (#32055715)

> Democrats hadn’t denounced any part of religious fundamentalism

This is a baffling assertion that takes about ten seconds to debunk. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/at-prayer-breakfast-obama-conde...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:As TikTok grows, so does suspicion by trasz on Monday July 11, 2022 @02:38PM (#32059978)

That’s not denouncing fundamentalism, that’s just asking to tone it down.

Can you quote a single US senator who openly called “life from conception” what it is, like they called out antivaxers?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:As TikTok grows, so does suspicion by illiac786 on Monday July 11, 2022 @03:58PM (#32060991)

What is, according to you, the definition of "life from conception"?

I'm a supporter of abortion but this is going to be fun I think.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:As TikTok grows, so does suspicion by trasz on Tuesday July 12, 2022 @04:43AM (#32067139)

The definition doesn’t matter, what matters is what it is: a fringe theory reinvented in late XIX century as part of Catholic hate campaign.

Your point being? As a reminder, we’re talking about democrats failing to condemn extremist ideas.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:As TikTok grows, so does suspicion by illiac786 on Friday July 15, 2022 @04:16PM (#32112284)

I was just curious, you were drifting off.

To your point, I think democrats and republicans positions on climate are very different: https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/07/us-support-for-envir...

That would go against your point that they support "largely the same ideas".

[ Parent | on HN ]