Re:Did Functional Programming Get It Wrong (Part 2) – Minecr...
by torginus on Saturday July 02, 2022 @06:05AM
(#31957667)
The weird thing is if you click on the author's name to view his other articles, it's not there either.
Re:Did Functional Programming Get It Wrong (Part 2) – Minecr...
by reinman on Saturday July 02, 2022 @06:39AM
(#31957830)
Yeah I don't support Medium anymore. If you are a programmer not an academic I would suggest you play w real software
https://portal.multix.catatonic.ai/
Re:Did Functional Programming Get It Wrong (Part 2) – Minecr...
by brobinson on Saturday July 02, 2022 @07:34AM
(#31958162)
Hey, this is wild. Ignore the hater/ad hominem in the sibling comment. This is really cool stuff. Love the design and aesthetic.
Re:Did Functional Programming Get It Wrong (Part 2) – Minecr...
by reinman on Saturday July 02, 2022 @07:49AM
(#31958240)
Sending the love back ! When I first learned this cat stuff I was a TOP hater so everyone giving me grief is just well deserved karma coming back to haunt me
Re:Did Functional Programming Get It Wrong (Part 2) – Minecr...
by realo on Saturday July 02, 2022 @07:03AM
(#31957973)
Hum…
I _did_ go there and got transported into something straight out of the 90’s , made by a 16-year old boy.
Did not find part 1 of the article, though.
Sorry.
Re:Did Functional Programming Get It Wrong (Part 2) – Minecr...
by reinman on Saturday July 02, 2022 @07:19AM
(#31958076)
Awesome retro dialup modem yes but this stuff goes much further back than 1990s
Actually 1960s
Whoever missed this connection, I don't trust him to talk about software.