News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Fran... by kiba on Thursday June 30, 2022 @08:12PM (#31940477)
AI is an extremely difficult challenge imposed by the current constraint. Change the constraint, then you don't need an AI to drive cars.
Re:Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Fran... by munchenphile on Thursday June 30, 2022 @08:43PM (#31940687)
Yep, this is the plain reality.

Self driving cars just feels like a bunch of engineers wanting to solve a really hard and really interesting problem. But is it really the right problem to solve? I don’t think so. Currently we have:

>other unpredictable human-driven vehicles on the road

>no sensors or passive/active guides in the physical infrastructure — guidance is completely determined onboard

>no signage designed for CV — everything written in plain English, so you have to waste compute on object detection and OCR. And, you have a constant and unending need to collect mapping data

>no vehicle-to-vehicle communication whatsoever

Design the roads and signage for self driving cars, enforce an industry-wide V2V standard with NHTSA, and start small in some test areas that only allow other vehicles that are part of the botnet (perhaps not necessarily self-driving, but at least part of the V2V network). That’s a reasonable problem space. The current one is unworkable — the models won’t converge and they’ll never make it out of “beta”.

Re:Driverless robotaxi fleet paralyzed for hours in San Fran... by nradov on Thursday June 30, 2022 @11:02PM (#31941789)
So you intend to ban bicycles from those areas? Because bikes are never going to have reliable V2V communication.