Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable

Re:Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable by century19 on Thursday June 30, 2022 @05:59AM (#31930493)

I worked for a large department in a large bank that changed from Jira to MS Teams Scrum, as the new licence for Jira was too much. No way that it had as many features as Jira, but it worked fine, maybe was simpler.

So it ain't nonsense, users do switch.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable by blntechie on Thursday June 30, 2022 @08:44AM (#31931673)

We used TFS in 2010 to create issues and stories and development workflows and i remember it worked fine with no major complaints. Especially as a full VS shop ,it even had very good integration for everything which can be done inside the Visual Studio itself. We eventually moved to JIRA though couple of years later.

I believe that TFS product evolved to Azure DevOps now.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable by rjgonza on Thursday June 30, 2022 @06:23AM (#31930632)

Intered to know more about "MS Teams Scrum", got a link or something?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable by lodovic on Thursday June 30, 2022 @06:45AM (#31930771)

My client uses Azure DevOps for ticketing and scrum processes, and that integrates nicely with Teams (pipelines, bugs, user stories, etc). It works pretty well and can be customized.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Atlassian is 20 years old and unprofitable by century19 on Thursday June 30, 2022 @09:05AM (#31931861)

Indeed, it was Azure DevOps. I had linked it with Teams as it was accessed through that, or so I remember.

[ Parent | on HN ]