Re:The future of privacy rights in a post-Roe world
by 99_00 on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @01:54PM
(#31923533)
>Because that is what the ruling in the case of Roe vs. Wade was, so it's been precedent in the United States for almost 50 years that the right to an abortion explicitly results from the right to bodily privacy.
Your argument appears be that precedents should never be overturned. If that's correct, your argument is obviously bad on the face of it. If that's wrong, I wonder what your argument actually is.
Because that is what the ruling in the case of Roe vs. Wade was, so it's been precedent in the United States for almost 50 years that the right to an abortion explicitly results from the right to bodily privacy.
> Everyone agrees that the right to privacy is in the constitution.
The recent Supreme Court ruling asserts that the right to privacy is not in the constitution.