Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by andrew_ on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @10:30PM
(#31915790)
Why did you snip "in addition to..." from the quote and argue to the least important and hardest to prove part? The meat is in the rest of the sentence.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by throwaway81523 on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @05:43AM
(#31918092)
You started defining what a straw purchase was, your definition was completely wrong, and technothrasher explained your error.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto...
by andrew_ on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @09:24AM
(#31919759)
That's incorrect. The statement was only true under both conditions. The user chose to chop one half off to argue the whole. If you have citable evidence to the contrary, please provide. The link I provided cited actual Florida and Federal law.