News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by HWR_14 on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @09:27PM (#31915388)
That sounds like you're describing a current transfer regime. We're talking about requiring background checks. An NICS background check completes in 30 seconds.

California's more draconian rules than what's been proposed has no bearing on anything.

Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by HideousKojima on Tuesday June 28, 2022 @10:38PM (#31915842)
California's (and other states') rules have a huge bearing on the issue, because they're clear examples of what gun control advocates are trying to implement since they're what they've actually implemented.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by giantg2 on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @07:47AM (#31918842)
To have access to NICS you need to be an FFL. So you at least have to go to an FFL. They will charge you to do the check and federally required paperwork (which takes longer than 30 seconds). The only thing that the other poster said that isn't something universal at the federal level is the waiting period.
Re:Gun owners’ private information leaked by California Atto... by vdqtp3 on Wednesday June 29, 2022 @04:14PM (#31925167)
It's actually quite germane, considering that this is the way your proposal is implemented in real life.