Neither party has had the votes to do that in a while (2/3rds in both the House and the Senate). It must also be ratified by 3/4ths of the states (38 right now).

Not going to happen for a long time.

Edit: Quick scan show the last time a party had 2/3rds majority in both was 1965-1967 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_divisions_of_United_Stat...)

The founders had no qualms about strongly disenfranchising people. The founders were NOT good people by any measurement.

An amendment on an issue this polarizing would never get the requisite support from enough states, no to mention that it doesn’t even matter if you control three branches of government to pass an amendment, only Congress is involved in the process.

Do you really think that a Republican controlled Congress for the majority of the 2010s would have allowed such a law to remain on the books?

Do you really think no superfluous law is ever passed...? The books are full of them.

> such a law would’ve be repealed the moment republicans regain control of the congress

Maybe, or maybe it would have increased Democratic majorities and forced Republicans to face a politically dangerous repeal or even a major policy switch.

Politicians are ready to go with the flow... see for example gay marriage in the UK, which was cautiously introduced by Labour as a separate formulation and then brought into full existence, with great fanfare, by a Conservative Party that had been staunchly against it for decades prior.

A comment ago you were complaining about political theater, how is passing superfluous laws anything but political theater?

> Maybe, or maybe it would have increased Democratic majorities and forced Republicans to face a politically dangerous repeal or even a major policy switch.

This suggests to me that you aren’t very familiar with the last 50 years of American political history.