News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by wbsss4412 on Friday June 24, 2022 @12:13PM (#31864646)
Except it isn’t valid, because while there was a Supreme Court precedent, such a law would be superfluous, and while there now isn’t, such a law would’ve be repealed the moment republicans regain control of the congress.

Do you really think that a Republican controlled Congress for the majority of the 2010s would have allowed such a law to remain on the books?

Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by toyg on Friday June 24, 2022 @12:23PM (#31864887)
> such a law would be superfluous

Do you really think no superfluous law is ever passed...? The books are full of them.

> such a law would’ve be repealed the moment republicans regain control of the congress

Maybe, or maybe it would have increased Democratic majorities and forced Republicans to face a politically dangerous repeal or even a major policy switch.

Politicians are ready to go with the flow... see for example gay marriage in the UK, which was cautiously introduced by Labour as a separate formulation and then brought into full existence, with great fanfare, by a Conservative Party that had been staunchly against it for decades prior.

Re:Supreme Court Overturns Roe vs. Wade by wbsss4412 on Friday June 24, 2022 @01:10PM (#31865854)
> Do you really think no superfluous law is ever passed...?

A comment ago you were complaining about political theater, how is passing superfluous laws anything but political theater?

> Maybe, or maybe it would have increased Democratic majorities and forced Republicans to face a politically dangerous repeal or even a major policy switch.

This suggests to me that you aren’t very familiar with the last 50 years of American political history.