> It's not a way of "giving back"
Github Advanced Security costs me $200+/month, but if I make my repository public, I get all of that for free.
Certainly feels like a way of giving back.
Of course it benefits them too, but it doesn’t have to be purely altruistic to be a net positive.
Their point is that they didn't need to own GitHub to build copilot—they could have used the public code regardless.
It's a lot more complicated to crawl code somewhere in the web than to crawl github.
They could even change github so it benefits their code crawling.
Re:GitHub Copilot is generally available
by buildbot on Wednesday June 22, 2022 @12:51AM
(#31832155)
That would be a problem if Microsoft didn’t also have their own Bing
Oh, is Bing still a thing? Honest question, haven't heard it mentioned for years. Went from Altavista to Google (I believe, it's a long time ago...) and now to DDG a couple of years ago. Never considered Bing directly although I believe DDG results come or came from Bing.
Hosting code "for free" is part of its business model. It's not a way of "giving back"