News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Artistic Radiance Fields by kleer001 on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @12:34PM (#31825911)
cool stuff, but isn't style-transfer pretty old hat? even on moving images?
Re:Artistic Radiance Fields by killerstorm on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @01:48PM (#31826927)
It's not a "moving image", it's a neural radiance field (NeRF), a way to represent a 3D scene using a neural network.

Style transfer worked on pixels, this approach works on the scene itself, before it's rasterized.

Re:Artistic Radiance Fields by bckr on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @12:45PM (#31826078)
it seems like this is more stable. the style applies over a 3D world without noticeable artifacts or distortions
Re:Artistic Radiance Fields by wwalexander on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @12:56PM (#31826246)
This was my impression as well. It seems to have some sort of object permanence when the camera is moved rather than just convoluting a single frame; seems significantly more difficult to me as a layman.
Re:Artistic Radiance Fields by corysama on Tuesday June 21, 2022 @01:36PM (#31826789)
Yep. There has been some work to figure out frame-to-frame coherence on a sequence of images in 2D. But, I think this skips over that problem by working in 3D.