News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Breaking our Latin-1 assumptions (2017) by RicoElectrico on Saturday June 18, 2022 @06:18PM (#31794303)
If I had a dollar for every B2B software in my corp that screws up such basic thing...

Yet the box-ticker drones from IT procurement are content with vendors who assume we live in a world without diacritic marks, I guess. Using 8-bit character sets in 2022 is a "brown M&M's" [1] indicator for me. If they can't be bothered to use Unicode, what else they don't care about?

[1] https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/232420

Re:Breaking our Latin-1 assumptions (2017) by walrus01 on Saturday June 18, 2022 @07:41PM (#31794811)
Really worrying is when you run into something like a major Canadian bank where the online banking portal system rejects passwords longer than 14 characters and with a wide range of standard english punctuation marks in it, likely because they're storing the damned thing as a plaintext string in some mainframe database field on equipment/software from the 1980s.

It was like that up until very recently for some gargantuan banks.

Re:Breaking our Latin-1 assumptions (2017) by spitfire on Sunday June 19, 2022 @05:20PM (#31803622)
IF it's TD, then it's AS/400. For reals.
Re:Breaking our Latin-1 assumptions (2017) by google234123 on Saturday June 18, 2022 @07:59PM (#31794893)
The point of this article is that unicode isn't a "basic thing".