What do you think is more likely, that the author forgot to add a LICENSE file or that he actually doesn't intend for ANYONE to use the language he created? Give me a break
The original comment was asking if the current legal status is that nobody is allowed to use ante without acquiring a licence separately (which is true) not whether the author's intention is that nobody use ante (which we don't know, but it seems unlikely.)
I thought the original comment was simply a big report: missing license file. With a snarky comment tagged on. I thought everyone assumed that, being shown by the author here, it was the latter.
>However, without a license, the default copyright laws apply, meaning that you retain all rights to your source code and no one may reproduce, distribute, or create derivative works from your work.