Re:Ante: A low-level functional language
by kqr on Saturday June 18, 2022 @01:15AM
(#31787403)
The original comment was asking if the current legal status is that nobody is allowed to use ante without acquiring a licence separately (which is true) not whether the author's intention is that nobody use ante (which we don't know, but it seems unlikely.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I thought the original comment was simply a big report: missing license file. With a snarky comment tagged on. I thought everyone assumed that, being shown by the author here, it was the latter.