Re:Ten years after the Higgs, physicists face the nightmare ...
by timdiggerm on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @12:24PM
(#31755349)
Mathematically, yes. But in terms of value, no.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ten years after the Higgs, physicists face the nightmare ...
by nerdponx on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @01:27PM
(#31756274)
An economist might notate this as "0.000 ≻ 0.00".
Curly comparison operators like "≻" (U+227B SUCCEEDS) are often used specifically to avoid ambiguity with traditional comparison operators like ">". See: https://www.oeconomist.com/blogs/daniel/wp-content/uploads/2...
Re:Ten years after the Higgs, physicists face the nightmare ...
by hombre_fatal on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @08:26PM
(#31761162)
Heh, I think a barely different glyph introduces more ambiguity than it solves. On my screen it’s effectively the same glyph but now with “oh, well it’s actually different.”
Re:Ten years after the Higgs, physicists face the nightmare ...
by nerdponx on Thursday June 16, 2022 @07:53PM
(#31772416)
I noticed that they are pretty similar in some fonts at small sizes, but in traditional math fonts and handwritten, these operators tend to be very "curly" and easy to distinguish.