News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ten years after the Higgs, physicists face the nightmare ... by evanb on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @11:57AM (#31754972)
You have the inequality backwards!
Re:Ten years after the Higgs, physicists face the nightmare ... by timdiggerm on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @12:24PM (#31755349)
Mathematically, yes. But in terms of value, no.
Re:Ten years after the Higgs, physicists face the nightmare ... by nerdponx on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @01:27PM (#31756274)
An economist might notate this as "0.000 ≻ 0.00".

Curly comparison operators like "≻" (U+227B SUCCEEDS) are often used specifically to avoid ambiguity with traditional comparison operators like ">". See: https://www.oeconomist.com/blogs/daniel/wp-content/uploads/2...

Re:Ten years after the Higgs, physicists face the nightmare ... by hombre_fatal on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @08:26PM (#31761162)
Heh, I think a barely different glyph introduces more ambiguity than it solves. On my screen it’s effectively the same glyph but now with “oh, well it’s actually different.”
Re:Ten years after the Higgs, physicists face the nightmare ... by nerdponx on Thursday June 16, 2022 @07:53PM (#31772416)
I noticed that they are pretty similar in some fonts at small sizes, but in traditional math fonts and handwritten, these operators tend to be very "curly" and easy to distinguish.
Re:Ten years after the Higgs, physicists face the nightmare ... by w-j-w on Wednesday June 15, 2022 @12:15PM (#31755233)
If he is comparing meaningfulness as the parent comment would imply, then he has it right.