News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reverse engineering Skifree by sph on Sunday June 12, 2022 @08:19PM (#31719555)
Do we need to ask this question every time? Do we need to derail the comments with the meta discussion about this person, every single time?
Re:Reverse engineering Skifree by devmor on Sunday June 12, 2022 @08:50PM (#31719764)
Seems like that'd stop if we stopped linking to their posts, no?
Re:Reverse engineering Skifree by bogantech on Sunday June 12, 2022 @09:37PM (#31720038)
If you post something publicly on Twitter etc don't expect people to ask for consent to share
[dead]
Re:Reverse engineering Skifree by orpheansodality on Sunday June 12, 2022 @09:43PM (#31720067)
*they - it’s right there in their twitter description
Re:Reverse engineering Skifree by alehlopeh on Sunday June 12, 2022 @10:07PM (#31720208)
It’s already quite a stretch to expect every commenter to have read TFA, and it’s a much bigger stretch to assume that every random HN submitter will have any clue that this person once said they would like people to stop linking their posts on HN.
Re:Reverse engineering Skifree by bigbillheck on Monday June 13, 2022 @08:03AM (#31724248)
What's not a stretch is using 'they' to refer to someone whose gender you don't already know.
Re:Reverse engineering Skifree by Gordonjcp on Monday June 13, 2022 @02:43AM (#31722043)
What was the question?
Re:Reverse engineering Skifree by account42 on Monday June 13, 2022 @10:10AM (#31725830)
You can see the content of [dead] comments if you enable showdead on your profile.