News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WT.Social by encryptluks2 on Saturday June 11, 2022 @07:19PM (#31709425)
You know when you try to visit a site, and they tell you they value privacy and freedom—but then require that you register to view their site, they are a cult.
Re:WT.Social by wilg on Saturday June 11, 2022 @09:11PM (#31710262)
How does having a user account make you less free or infringe on your privacy?
Re:WT.Social by astrange on Saturday June 11, 2022 @10:03PM (#31710556)
Letting them correlate your access patterns certainly does reduce privacy.
Re:WT.Social by bawolff on Saturday June 11, 2022 @10:22PM (#31710670)
Fun fact, you don't need user registration to do that.
Re:WT.Social by theamk on Sunday June 12, 2022 @10:06PM (#31720200)
But user registration makes it so much easier! Single identifier shared across all user's devices and browsers, and which survives reinstalls, cookie eraser plugins, and needa no GDPR notice - that's the best thing an advertizer can hope for.
Re:WT.Social by bawolff on Monday June 13, 2022 @02:39PM (#31729652)
Sure, but its a bad metric to decide what sites to use. The evil ones will still track you regardless, the non-evil won't regardless.
Re:WT.Social by encryptluks2 on Sunday June 12, 2022 @06:27AM (#31713436)
Usually registering an account also requires an email address. However, if definitely indicates wanting to track your use on their site.
Re:WT.Social by lexx on Saturday June 11, 2022 @07:43PM (#31709608)
If they don't say they value privacy and freedom, what are they?