Re:Why are nuclear power construction costs so high?
by ethbr0 on Thursday June 09, 2022 @06:54PM
(#31687980)
> Here's an idea: offer one of these micro/modular reactors for free to a developer of a new residential division...
One word: Epcot
It's something Disney and Florida could probably agree on, would be a wholesome PR story about investing in Walt's futurism dreams, and would be easier to negotiate than with a less-planned development.
And finally, what better showcase than "If it's safe enough for Disney"?
Our Friend the Atom, indeed https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QRzl1wHc43I
Re:Why are nuclear power construction costs so high?
by nhoughto on Thursday June 09, 2022 @11:35PM
(#31689700)
And also they already can, if you believe it:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-15/disney-wo...
Re:Why are nuclear power construction costs so high?
by ethbr0 on Friday June 10, 2022 @06:31AM
(#31692202)
Yeah... chose not to highlight that, as it seemed a clickbaity way of saying "Disney has historically had substantial independence in zoning" (which is a more accurate but less exciting way to phrase it).
Re:Why are nuclear power construction costs so high?
by XorNot on Thursday June 09, 2022 @08:34PM
(#31688660)
Reactors can provide peak power no problems, the incentive not to is you burn fuel at a higher rate then you need to since you can't ramp quickly. But in a small scale scenario you could easily oversize the reactor to service the local area, and sell any excess on the grid as though it were a renewable utility.
Re:Why are nuclear power construction costs so high?
by cryptonector on Thursday June 09, 2022 @11:46PM
(#31689782)
That's fair. Excess power can be driven into the ground, and at small scales it can be sold to the grid.
I would consider living in a division that has extra low-cost electricity. It couldn't be zero cost because nuclear could only provide base load power, unless one of these micro/modular reactor types is so innovative that it can provide base and peak load power, in which case such a division could have truly zero-cost power for a bunch of years.
I.e., promote the darned things, loss-lead if need be.
If the manufacturer won't take such risks, then might never break through.
I bet that after a few years you could get such good press out of it that other developers might sign on.