Personally, I need to practice leetcode style questions pretty regularly in order to perform reliably without reference materials. If more than a couple of months go by, the details of particular algorithms begin to fade.

I think it's unreasonable to expect people to spend their off time practicing these sorts of problems, in the same way we think it's unreasonable to require everyone interviewing to be working on personal development projects over the weekend. I suspect most working people simply do not have the time.

You can memorize a lot of them and forget everything in a year.

If enough people are doing it higher iq folks will bubble up in calibration

Which at the end of the day still doesn't test that you can do the job.

Ok but it does tho - all other things being equal and you better believe it they do have other type of interviews not just lc

Ok, tell me what other types of interviews do they do other than system design, leetcode, and behaviorial for engineering?

Lol yeah apart from sanitation, the medicine, education, wine and public order what have the romans ever done to us? In your view that’s not enough to make an informed eng hire?

Lol. So you can't give me any concrete examples. Got it.

Nothing tells me more about someone that is full of it than simply being dismissive of others. I ask for an example to support your argument, instead you chose to be defensive and give me attitude.

Exactly. If you have a candidate who can design good systems, solve complex algorithmic problems, and play nice with others, then I’d say that’s a pretty strong candidate.