News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by jeffbee on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @10:39AM (#31655021)
Why is the local fab specifically important? They're still going to fly the wafers to Malaysia or wherever for packaging, right? And the tools and chemicals will all be made elsewhere, won't they? It's not as simple as having a steady supply of apples from your local orchard.
Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by mojzu on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @10:46AM (#31655132)
I'd imagine it won't replace the entire supply chain in one go (although I think quite a bit of semiconductor tooling is already manufactured in the EU), but I think it's a step on the path towards that. Which is probably a good thing considering how fragile it appears some of our hyper-efficient globalised supply chains can be
Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by ChemSpider on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @10:47AM (#31655144)
That part is solved:

(1) German BASF is one of the manufactures for "semiconductor chemicals".

(2) More important: Getting parts from Malaysia (etc) is no issue as I don't think they plan to attack any neighboring countries in the next decade. Also, they did not start a trade boycott against Lithuania just over the name of an trade office.

Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by coffeeblack on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @11:11AM (#31655528)
If there is a conflict with China, maritime routes will become much less reliable than they are now, after 75+ years of peace and 30+ years of a unipolar international system.
Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by paganel on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @01:31PM (#31657593)
Plus, I suspect that in a The West vs China war a country like Malaysia will think twice before choosing a side, and I'm afraid they won't choose the West by default.
Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by TedDoesntTalk on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @03:06PM (#31658726)
And the possibility port blockades.
Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by ratww on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @10:55AM (#31655271)
Exactly.

Malaysia can still be a partner, however this is a big step that opens the door for replacing labor in distant countries with another EU neighbour. This is good for the entire EU.

Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by dkjaudyeqooe on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @11:02AM (#31655393)
Self sufficiency for products that are the lifeblood of your economy is attractive to governments.

Any of the things you describe can easily be replicated locally, fabs much less so.

Even more to the point is that it gives countries the chance to develop a high value competitive advantage that others cannot replicate.

Places like the EU would argue that they have the human capital to compete globally but they don't have the industry because of historical factors.

Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by arlort on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @12:01PM (#31656276)
Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by KptMarchewa on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @10:42AM (#31655071)
There's a lot of assumptions there. Why don't you assume that it's about having as much of the supply chain locally?
Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by ezsmi on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @12:09PM (#31656421)
Assembly services are all over the place. Here's a large one in Escondido, CA which is commonly used. https://www.qptechnologies.com/about-us/company-info-bios/
Re:Germany paying $5.5B for Intel fab by sva_ on Tuesday June 07, 2022 @10:42AM (#31655067)
I think sourcing those things would be a lot easier than building a fab, on a time scale.