News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by giantg2 on Monday June 06, 2022 @09:16AM (#31640046)
Do we have a sustainable solution for 'green' roads? Or are we going to continue using asphalt and concrete? And of course there's the source of the electricity for charging. Those affect warming too. I wouldn't call it really green if it still relies heavily on non-green tech to operate. Maybe a step in the right direction, but the overall system it requires to operate in is still 'dirty', with no end in sight.
Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by kiliantics on Monday June 06, 2022 @10:17AM (#31640804)
Exactly. If this Kurzgesagt video is to be believed, then the average road costs as much carbon to build PER METRE (!!) as it takes to produce one car:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiw6_JakZFc

Heavier vehicles like trucks (and EVs are heavier in general) cause much quicker degradation of roads. And doubling down on private vehicle use with EVs is going to increase demand for roads across the board. It's just so far from a useful solution to go down this route.

Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by JaimeThompson on Monday June 06, 2022 @09:29AM (#31640188)
While I do not know how much carbon is created during the recycling asphalt is nearly 100% recyclable.
Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by giantg2 on Monday June 06, 2022 @09:42AM (#31640320)
My point is that asphalt is petroleum based, absorbs heat from the sun, and requires energy to heat it when building.
Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by guerrilla on Monday June 06, 2022 @11:22AM (#31641639)
We can generate heat with electricity.
Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by giantg2 on Monday June 06, 2022 @11:29AM (#31641730)
That could be viable, but would only solve half the issue assuming the electricity was 100% renewable. Then you still have the solar absorption problem.
Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by guerrilla on Monday June 06, 2022 @11:37AM (#31641845)
> Then you still have the solar absorption problem.

What do you mean, lower albedo?

Re:Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industri... by giantg2 on Monday June 06, 2022 @12:52PM (#31642842)
Yes