I don't see any undeserved shifting of blame to males. I think you are just playing the victim here. Women simply aren't as violent by nature.

When you look at government programs designed to help those in need, would you say there is an equitable gender distribution in those programs? Or really forget equitable, are there any programs designed specifically for helping males who find themselves suffering in any way? Because I suspect nobody could even count the number designed for females. And not just government programs, but scholarships, hiring initiatives etc. That ratio must be 100-1 at least.

So how is this reality supposed to be processed by males who find themselves stuck? Many, or perhaps most, will internalize it and just push forward. Others will lash out.

Females have a societal safety net designed to catch them when they fall, males do not. I don't think anybody would dispute that, the question is what effect does that have on the psyche of those who are left helpless?

You've got an axe, and you love to grind it. Shootings predate Identity politics.

"the rise of that correlates to the increase in shootings."

I'm not sure where you think you read that there were no shootings prior to the rise of divisive identity politics.

The rise of shootings also happened before identity politics became a thing.