Re:Another stablecoin loses peg – DEI team working to restor...
by wing-_-nuts on Tuesday May 17, 2022 @11:34AM
(#31412240)
I don't think you understand how referendums work. They require a certain number of signatures to even be considered. There would obviously be a filtering mechanism for trolls.
Re:Another stablecoin loses peg – DEI team working to restor...
by ceejayoz on Tuesday May 17, 2022 @04:04PM
(#31415667)
Until you recruit enough trolls.
Re:Another stablecoin loses peg – DEI team working to restor...
by jefb on Tuesday May 17, 2022 @12:08PM
(#31412721)
The perquisite to successful DAO's is actually a strong centralized universal identity system (which is ironically counter to cryto-bro anarcho-capitalists philosophies).
From there it's pretty easy to associate real political capital with digital decisions.
E.g. Automatic n+1 "ban proposing user" option added to all proposals. If after n votes (where n is large) the sum(ban proposing user) > 0.25*sum(all other options), proposal is removed and user is banned until a proposal to unban is passed.
A. Hitler Mustache
B. KKK Hood
Do you think everyone should have to vote on that?