That's not how it works. You're not the only person asking this VC for $100k. A thousand other people are, too. A policy where he spares it for (what he considers) a bad investment like yours means sparing it for all the other bad investments, too. That would cost a lot more than just one check.
Well, the market agreed with you up until few months ago, now it really does seem like we had quite a few bullshit companies. Not all of them of course, but lots.
Look at your own investment portfolio. Are you investing $1 at a time in fractional shares of a million different stocks, or investing $1000 at a time on a smaller number of stocks/funds you expect to have solid returns? (You think his crypto bids are misguided. Maybe you're right. Not your money though.)
If you're certain about your product, you don't need an investor. You need a small business loan.
The idea is a service that could open the black box of online video content. Right now you search for something and get the whole video as a result; if it's a 3 hour long podcast you're going to be doing a lot of seeking for specific information. I want to index and enable deep visualized search through video libraries and in videos. Basically splitting videos into linguistically salient topics, keywords and entities. That would allow you to analyze and visualize content (YouTube channels, videos, etc.) to find interesting information. Good for researchers and people looking for something specific, or people wanting to find new content (relationship graphs).
And what are your plans for revenue? How do you plan to make money? You'll be dealing with a lot of legal questions related to IP licensing, and the legal fees alone would eat your $100k in a month or two, even before the licensing costs for the videos.
All-in-all, I can't fault the investor for turning you down. You haven't put enough thought into the business aspects of your idea for him to entrust his money to you.
And don't bring up this crypto bullshit. It's irrelevant that he's investing in crypto companies; he already knows he's gambling with those and he's not treating those like real investments. Given crypto's history, he just needs to bail at the right time to come out ahead.
Sounds very interesting. I was thinking about this the other day in the context of golf. Thanks to Youtube, I can learn from watching the swing of any player in the world/history. But while a golf swing takes only 2 seconds or so, they're all "locked up" in lengthy videos. And forget about searching for one person's swing vs another.
This isn't the best example of this feature, but it sure has saved me a lot of time in other queries that I can't recall at the moment.
Besides Matt Damon I suppose.
Your confusion is assuming that "bullshit" means "unprofitable". Plenty of projects turn profit for their owners.
What do you think purpose of a fund is? To provide returns for their LPs.
You need to pitch to an angel investor who might care about the mission than a business fund.
Why would they invest in bad projects? Because they are humans who happens to have a crap ton of money. As humans, they're susceptible to FOMO and hype. They are susceptible to things like first impressions, a good slide deck, a good sales person, etc.
All this to say is that it might be the VC, it might you, or it might be your project. Who knows. This is why many founders end up pitching to 30-40 VCs because sometimes it's a numbers game.
The whole VC funding thing is a game that you have to learn about and crack. The easiest way to crack it is to show you have growing revenue. The next best thing is to show you have growing users. If you do not have growth, then you'll just have to hustle and put on your best sales game.
Just keep at it. Don't get upset at any particular no. Remember that it's their money and you're not entitled to it.
SV has lost its soul. A VC that respected tech nerds would see your technical idea, (maybe) discount the investment, and then get on the phone and help you find a business partner that will take you all the way (and give you first right of refusal on assholes).
The whole point of VC is cash to be unprofitable. Grow faster by overspending today.
I pitched an idea to a VC, which I had a prototype for, looking for $100k. He liked it but wouldn't fund because I didn't have a solid business plan. Fair enough, I need to find a business partner. But then he told me something about how I have to imagine that it's $100k of my money. I need to respect it properly and ask myself: would I give someone this money so easily? Meanwhile he had his hands in various bullshit crypto (not hating on crypto, just the projects) defi startups.
I thought it was absurd, of course I don't respect your money: VC firms throw $250k+ around like candy to people who happen to give a specific quasi-Silicon Valley impression or are in crypto. You're telling me you can't spare $100k? Also, I haven't seen a single "promising" startup actually be profitable, except those ones made without major funding.
This has all been some kind of weird ass circus for years, I'm glad the bubbles are bursting.