News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Project Denver by LarsAlereon on Tuesday May 10, 2022 @12:06AM (#31323340)
Denver was a real tragedy. The original point was to be a processor that could run both x86 and ARM code, but Intel managed to win a lawsuit that terminated the x86 license nVidia acquired. That took the wind out of their sales and they never productized Tegra going forward.
Re:Project Denver by IsopropylHarbor on Tuesday May 10, 2022 @10:14AM (#31327377)
Somehow, “sales” still works in that analogy and it’s kind of great.

Set sail for home! They’re having a 20% off sale!

Re:Project Denver by nine_k on Monday May 09, 2022 @10:51PM (#31322876)
Was it more commercially successful that Transmeta Crusoe, which was, AFAICT, the pioneering attempt in this area?
Re:Project Denver by CalChris on Monday May 09, 2022 @11:29PM (#31323115)
Many of the Crusoe people moved over from Transmeta to Stexar which was acquired by NVIDIA.
Re:Project Denver by wmf on Monday May 09, 2022 @11:37PM (#31323151)
Not really; Nvidia keeps switching back to Cortex cores.
Re:Project Denver by monocasa on Monday May 09, 2022 @09:39PM (#31322363)
A great walkthrough of the architecture by one of the engineers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEuXA0_9feM

Re:Project Denver by enos_feedler on Monday May 09, 2022 @09:46PM (#31322409)
Project Denver held so much promise at Nvidia as a vehicle for CPU sales into the PC market. What is a modern day project denver inside other companies?
Re:Project Denver by x3n0ph3n3 on Monday May 09, 2022 @09:34PM (#31322326)
Why is this suddenly discussion-worthy? Poster didn't even bother with a submission statement for such a vague link to a wikipedia page?