News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Knowledge is like a house of cards by idiotsecant on Thursday May 05, 2022 @04:25PM (#31278001)
>Trying to think of knowledge as house of cards is stupid because it somehow implies that knowledge is inherently unstable, which is not true.

Not to be a pedant, but actually to be a pedant : Are you sure? I think the list of absolutely true things 200 years ago and the list of absolutely true things now are probably pretty divergent!

Re:Knowledge is like a house of cards by fernandohur on Thursday May 05, 2022 @04:37PM (#31278112)
Nassim Taleb's Black Swan is also a great read on the instability (or in his words, fragility) of knowledge. A single observation is quite often enough to break what has been considered solid knowledge for years.
Re:Knowledge is like a house of cards by pixl97 on Thursday May 05, 2022 @06:00PM (#31278839)
Eh, you also have to discern between individual bits of knowledge and systems knowledge when considering systems stability.

You can have complete knowledge of a component, but that may not be helpful when attempting to determine the affect of that component in a system where you have incomplete knowledge of other components.

Nonlinear systems that trigger at thresholds are a good example of this.

Re:Knowledge is like a house of cards by xmprt on Friday May 06, 2022 @03:17AM (#31282286)
That's fair. But is it helpful to anyone to think about knowledge shifts on timescales that are longer than two lifetimes?