Re:Ask HN: Is the EULA on my new $30k RED cinema camera legal?
by kube-system on Friday April 29, 2022 @03:10PM
(#31209442)
Unless the telemetry they are talking about is anonymized.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Is the EULA on my new $30k RED cinema camera legal?
by Nextgrid on Friday April 29, 2022 @03:14PM
(#31209485)
Which it absolutely isn't, since they're reserving themselves the right to use it for advertising purposes. If it was properly anonymised it would be completely useless for such purposes.
Re:Ask HN: Is the EULA on my new $30k RED cinema camera legal?
by kube-system on Friday April 29, 2022 @03:24PM
(#31209607)
That is likely a fair assumption, but an assumption nonetheless. There exists marketing data which does not identify individuals.
Re:Ask HN: Is the EULA on my new $30k RED cinema camera legal?
by red_throwaway on Friday April 29, 2022 @04:01PM
(#31209976)
> There exists marketing data which does not identify individuals.
As these datasets grow (and they only grow), it becomes trivial to tie anonymized profiles to a specific person. They leave off names and it's expected that the final consumer of the data do the "last mile" work of tying it to the name. The easy part.
Re:Ask HN: Is the EULA on my new $30k RED cinema camera legal?
by bryanrasmussen on Friday April 29, 2022 @04:02PM
(#31209989)
it's actually pretty difficult to anonymize data and not have it be able to de-anonymized, at any rate the question regarded privacy rights and if things are anonymized that's not what the question would be then.