Combined with willfully ignoring that basically all floors are intentionally understaffed and have been for years.
We probably agree about the staffing levels to an extent, but I would be curious to hear the staffing estimation methodologies used in your experience.
I'm not sure its the flex in this argument you think it is.
I mean they clearly are still working there, they can always do a bit more to cover right?
My position is not that they were always adequately staffed, but that in my experience increasing staffing did not fix the problems as expected because the problems were rooted in more systemic issues. As I've stated elsewhere staffing may be part of the solution but rarely a panacea. Also, my stance is that fixing the systemic issues will help them do less non-patient-centered work so they can focus more on being a healthcare provider, where they are the most valuable.
As an example, if we assume you are a software engineer and you double your work hours, will you double your code output? Probably not, just like it's not a 1:1 translation of nurse hours to patient care.