Don’t you think it would have been very visible if he were bad at delegating? His companies tend to produce results - not always on time, but that’s to be expected in greenfield projects right?

Not only do they produce results, they tend to save humanity while doing so.

> He doesn't need to spend much time with his companies to damage them.

Couple of questions spring to mind:

1. Can you define "damage"?

"Elon Musk poised to collect $23bn bonus as Tesla beats targets" [0]

"Tesla reported record revenue and profits for the first quarter of 2022 [..]"[1]

2. Would you say the current management of Twitter are doing a good job on behalf of their shareholders?

"Twitter misses ad revenue and user growth estimates; revenue forecast light"[2]

[0] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/apr/21/elon-musk-s...

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdurot/2022/04/20/elon-musk-...

[2] https://www.reuters.com/technology/twitter-misses-ad-revenue...

> I haven't seen much evidence he's good at delegating.

You think Elon Musk created two of the most valuable companies in the world without being good at delegating?

I think pretty highly of him, but not that highly.

Which of his companies are damaged?