News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by wayne on Sunday September 21, 2008 @10:48PM (#310760)
It's probably not the stack I would pick and my initial reaction is always to gasp when I see startups built on Microsoft, but...

- ASP.NET can scale, if you do it right. Aside from Microsoft.com/MSN, which don't really count, MySpace uses it (though they upgraded from ColdFusion, which wasn't much better) and Plenty of Fish, the web's largest dating site, uses it too: http://www.plentyoffish.com/about_team.aspx These are probably all larger than the most successful Rails sites.

- ASP.NET MVC isn't a horrible programming model. Forget the abomination that's normal ASP.NET with its funky events. If you've used another MVC framework like Rails or Cake, you'll feel right at home.

- Microsoft's startup program gives startups the early software for super cheap: http://microsoftstartupzone.com/

- It's all about getting v1 out and releasing early and often. If your team grew up on Microsoft, are you really going to make them all learn a new framework? If you do it right and prove out your idea, you can always rewrite later.

Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by mattmaroon on Sunday September 21, 2008 @11:43PM (#310802)
Also, lot easier to find programmers if you're in .net or java. One might argue about the quality, but certainly the supply is much larger.
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by pchristensen on Monday September 22, 2008 @08:54AM (#311077)
"my initial reaction is always to gasp when I see startups built on Microsoft, but..."

What would you recommend that career Microsoft developers use for their startups?

Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by tocomment on Monday September 22, 2008 @09:15AM (#311092)
Maybe just have static html pages, web services, and jquery for Ajax. Use whatever you want for the web services (Python)