News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by wayne on Sunday September 21, 2008 @10:48PM (#310760)
It's probably not the stack I would pick and my initial reaction is always to gasp when I see startups built on Microsoft, but...

- ASP.NET can scale, if you do it right. Aside from Microsoft.com/MSN, which don't really count, MySpace uses it (though they upgraded from ColdFusion, which wasn't much better) and Plenty of Fish, the web's largest dating site, uses it too: http://www.plentyoffish.com/about_team.aspx These are probably all larger than the most successful Rails sites.

- ASP.NET MVC isn't a horrible programming model. Forget the abomination that's normal ASP.NET with its funky events. If you've used another MVC framework like Rails or Cake, you'll feel right at home.

- Microsoft's startup program gives startups the early software for super cheap: http://microsoftstartupzone.com/

- It's all about getting v1 out and releasing early and often. If your team grew up on Microsoft, are you really going to make them all learn a new framework? If you do it right and prove out your idea, you can always rewrite later.

Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by mattmaroon on Sunday September 21, 2008 @11:43PM (#310802)
Also, lot easier to find programmers if you're in .net or java. One might argue about the quality, but certainly the supply is much larger.
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by pchristensen on Monday September 22, 2008 @08:54AM (#311077)
"my initial reaction is always to gasp when I see startups built on Microsoft, but..."

What would you recommend that career Microsoft developers use for their startups?

Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by tocomment on Monday September 22, 2008 @09:15AM (#311092)
Maybe just have static html pages, web services, and jquery for Ajax. Use whatever you want for the web services (Python)
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by known on Monday September 22, 2008 @07:24AM (#311015)
I didn't like stackoverflow.com UI.
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by chrisbroadfoot on Sunday September 21, 2008 @07:31PM (#310664)
ASP.net MVC in C# I believe
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by seiji on Sunday September 21, 2008 @07:29PM (#310663)
It's an abomination on so many levels.
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by tptacek on Sunday September 21, 2008 @08:18PM (#310688)
Hey, everyone, let's use this content-free comment to vote on how much we like ASP.NET!
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by axod on Monday September 22, 2008 @06:46AM (#311002)
Take a look at the html source and see if you think it's an abomination.
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by scott_s on Monday September 22, 2008 @10:02AM (#311134)
I don't. Why should I?

Also, you may want to peek at the HN HTML source.

Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by jwilliams on Sunday September 21, 2008 @11:31PM (#310790)
.. At least they didn't use Visual SourceSafe.
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by aschobel on Sunday September 21, 2008 @07:48PM (#310671)
If your team is comfortable with Microsoft's stack, why force them to learn Java/python?

Well, they other options are open. So it might make sense. :P

Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by kschrader on Sunday September 21, 2008 @08:14PM (#310685)
Microsoft's stack adds a not-insignificant cost to a 3-4 person bootstrapped startup's budget.

Up to you whether or not you're getting enough of a productivity gain to justify it.

Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by utnick on Sunday September 21, 2008 @09:28PM (#310722)
Visual studio express editions are free and a windows vps is cheap.

Even if you decide to spring for the full developer licenses you are looking at less than a week of a developers salary for some really good tools.

Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by anthonyrubin on Sunday September 21, 2008 @10:51PM (#310763)
During one of the podcasts I believe Jeff stated that he was able to get free copies of the most expensive version of Visual Studio from a friend at MS.
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by anthonyrubin on Sunday September 21, 2008 @10:51PM (#310764)
How much would SQL Server licenses cost?
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by icey on Monday September 22, 2008 @12:28AM (#310824)
I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt:

http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/express/default.mspx

Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by aschobel on Monday September 22, 2008 @01:01AM (#310843)
If you are a startup you can probably get Microsoft's software for free.

Talk to one of their technology evangelists, they love seeing cutting edge companies building their business on MS.

Anand Iyer, http://blogs.msdn.com/aniyer/, can point you in the right direction.

Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by michaelneale on Monday September 22, 2008 @02:00AM (#310873)
Jeff Attwood and co that built it are used to .Net/MS/Visual Studio development, so for them the cost was probably small compared to the cost of switching stacks + tools.
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by danw on Monday September 22, 2008 @08:07AM (#311046)
The MS stack also has lots of good tools which can help speed up development.
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by rw on Sunday September 21, 2008 @07:52PM (#310675)
With what was Stock Overflow built?
Re:What Was Stack Overflow Built With? by ph0rque on Sunday September 21, 2008 @08:09PM (#310682)
As long as we're being pedantic:

With what was Stack Overflow built?

:~)