News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:James Webb telescope's coldest instrument reaches operati... by throwthere on Monday April 18, 2022 @02:53PM (#31074885)
Kind of like a flat four or six engine versus inline/V6.
Re:James Webb telescope's coldest instrument reaches operati... by red369 on Monday April 18, 2022 @03:33PM (#31075337)
Flat fours and sixes definitely have a balance advantage over V6 engines, but I’m not sure there is much difference to a straight (in-line) four or six. They are also perfectly balanced until some higher order harmonic (something I can’t really remember at the moment). The advantage of flat engines are that they are much shorter, but then they’re heavier and more complicated because they have to have two heads. (Edited a typo in first sentence)
Re:James Webb telescope's coldest instrument reaches operati... by roamerz on Monday April 18, 2022 @08:15PM (#31078375)
Not necessarily. If memory serves GM had a V6 in the 70’s or 80’s that had offset crank journals to make each firing stroke 120 degrees apart. I think it was the 4.3
Re:James Webb telescope's coldest instrument reaches operati... by t0mas88 on Monday April 18, 2022 @04:13PM (#31075848)
The 6 in-line is the least vibrating one of the options, but the 4 is very close.
Re:James Webb telescope's coldest instrument reaches operati... by red369 on Monday April 18, 2022 @04:25PM (#31075994)
Were you including flat engines in that statement? Like, an online 6 is better balanced than a flat 6? If not, do you happen to know how a flat 6 compared with an inline 6 for vibrations/balance? A quick search didn’t find me anything. I know flat engines have to offset the cylinders a little.
Re:James Webb telescope's coldest instrument reaches operati... by nickff on Monday April 18, 2022 @06:30PM (#31077479)
Inline sixes are better-balanced than flat sixes.