Re:Richard Stallman – The state of the Free Software movement
by belorn on Monday April 18, 2022 @08:36AM
(#31069829)
Being a celebrity does provide much more benefits than a person actually being homeless.
However your comment above said he lived comfortably off the income of his own celebrity. We would have to twist the word income here for a bit to cover this kind of situation. The comfortably part is also a bit questionable, but I guess living at the office can be comfortable to some people. The description just didn't fit the situation that well, which is why I wrote the above comment.
Re:Richard Stallman – The state of the Free Software movement
by lovich on Monday April 18, 2022 @11:05AM
(#31071664)
Alright, if you want to be that pedantic then find+replace “income” with benefits. The point still stands. He has the basics of his life taken care of and tells others they should go without in the name of his ethics system
I understand he's forgone the amount of wealth he could have accumulated by just working in the software industry in the name of his cause, and that is laudable. However he thinks everyone should do this despite the greater burden they'd have to shoulder. All the people he tells shouldn't be making non free software so they can support themselves and their families are not going to be given free lodging by MIT.