News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Barbary Pirates and English Slaves (2017) by prepend on Sunday April 17, 2022 @09:29AM (#31060674)
> A lot of this, I think, is the result of geography rather than the Finns (or rather, their leaders) being different / special. Romania never participated in the colonial era as well but it's not they wouldn't have liked to.

Doesn’t this apply to everywhere though. I’m sure every country would have loved to colonize places but didn’t for various reasons.

I don’t think there are “evil” countries that colonized because they are evil. All countries that could, did.

Fortunately, recently people became more moral and have worked to limit this. Although cynically, I think it’s because the less evil way is no more lucrative.

Re:Barbary Pirates and English Slaves (2017) by badpun on Sunday April 17, 2022 @10:34AM (#31061109)
Poland wasn’t into colonizing. The country wasn’t overpopulated yet and the elites were very rich from grain exports anyway, so why bother competing with other European powers for the New World?
Re:Barbary Pirates and English Slaves (2017) by prepend on Sunday April 17, 2022 @04:07PM (#31063969)
Same reason why Germany didn’t colonize much, they didn’t exist.
Re:Barbary Pirates and English Slaves (2017) by hef19898 on Sunday April 17, 2022 @02:26PM (#31063012)
Poland as a nation didn't exist until the end of WW1. Difficult to colonize when you don't exist as a nation.
Re:Barbary Pirates and English Slaves (2017) by badpun on Monday April 18, 2022 @03:05PM (#31075023)
I’m speaking about Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, which existed during the first stages of colonisation, and in which Poland played the dominant role.