News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by swayvil on Thursday April 14, 2022 @11:37AM (#31028346)
Yes, you can block malicious actors and still be a proponent of free speech.
Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by lovich on Thursday April 14, 2022 @11:48AM (#31028519)
Can’t really call yourself a free speech absolutist at the same time though unless you’re comfortable with blatant lies. Malicious/manipulative speech is still speech
Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by themitigating on Thursday April 14, 2022 @12:10PM (#31028875)
Can Twitter block malicious actors and still be a proponent of free speech?
Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by marricks on Thursday April 14, 2022 @11:44AM (#31028461)
Does everyone consider Elon Jet a malicious actor? Who determines what a malicious actor is? I guess soon it could be Elon!
Re:Elon Musk makes $43B unsolicited bid to take Twitter private by swayvil on Thursday April 14, 2022 @06:35PM (#31034260)
That's an interesting question. I have been thinking about how social media might be run in a way that allows for such filtering, but without a centralized filtering authority.

Maybe you could rate actors. And you could also refer to actors' ratings of other actors. Weighted by the rating of the actor.

No doubt it's been done. But maybe something like that.