Teaching itself is never inherently harmful. Sanctions are authoritarian nonsense.
There has to be a limiting principle, and we have one in the law: giving comfort and aid to enemies of the United States and exporting controlled technology to sanctioned countries are prosecutable offenses. Sounds scary, but even those laws are limited.
Yes, that is correct. Teaching people is never directly harmful.
Invoking bogeymen by name is an emotional argument. What I said holds true.
We have a democratically elected Constitutional government which engages in foreign policy. It is not the place nor the right of a private citizen to undermine that foreign policy.
Wouldn’t you go to jail if you taught someone how to plan a murder, with the knowledge they clearly planned on using that information?
Next up teaching north korea how to farm better and how to dodge sanctions importing fertilizer is bad, because then their people wont starve as much and therefore can do more evil in the world via more energetic soldiers.
I don’t think I compared it to murder from an immediate seriousness perspective, but I’m sure the impact of Bitcoin on NK would cost more than one life’s worth of quality of life (improving the bottom line, helping the country resist sanctions for longer, etc).
He wasn't just teaching a country to manipulate bits and bytes he purposefully ignored all risks and existing laws to help break sanctions decided against a country based on geopolitical situation guided by matter experts.
You assume teaching is purely positive?
If I teach someone else my company secrets I only 'teached' or did I share company secrets?
If I go to north Korea did I teach the about some technology or did I just helped a country to circumvent sanctions?
You have a very easy perception of right and wrong if you think that's an acceptable excuse.
Very similar to the antivax people in Germany who broke demonstration laws by saying they just walking.