AlexCoventry
AlexCoventry on Hacker News
>
Around the same time, "Crypto Twitter" was spiraling into a mood that I saw described as "financial nihilism": roughly, that the natural end state of blockchains is gambling, this is good, and if you dislike this and wish for something better then you are a stuck-up elitist prick.Surely he sees that the nihilists are winning. Crypto's main use case at this point is undeniably deeply corrosive corruption and money laundering, and as far as I know there's nothing plausible on the horizon to replace that (I kind of stopped paying attention after crypto industry leaders started meeting with Trump, though.)
Serious people are predicting automated RSI in 6 months this time, FWIW.
>
What is the one thing that only you can specify, where your competitive advantage is maximized?Can you give some examples where people have done that?
Well, it's been clear for a decade that Trump doesn't respect American values.
IIRC from Prof: Alan Turing Decoded, Turing was sent to the US to work on this for a while, but wasn't able to contribute much, because the Americans didn't really trust him.
A lot of rationalists seem to believe that prolixity is a sign of intellectual effort.
They think the singularity's going to hit in the next 6 months. They're not looking to build an empire.
I think there are a lot of people who would pay very good money for access to mathematical and coding ability like OpenAI's systems have demonstrated. I wonder how much they're being paid by the USAF to try to unhork the F-35's avionics software, for instance.
When did they test them? Models have a different level of capability than 6 months ago, IMO.
Pelican benchmark is saturated, anyway. :-)
Did you watch the video? Her point is to use AI's productivity gains to iterate faster on the creative aspects.
> Terence Tao is arguing
It's a guest post by Amit Sahai, FWIW.
IMO, it's almost certainly being abused. I just assume that all US domestic communications are being recorded whenever possible.
It can be a textbook designation and a capricious punishment at the same time. It's almost comical, to suggest that anything about this decision was reasonable. Makes me long for the days of n-gate.com.
IME, it's best to ask an AI to criticize your work and suggest changes without providing actual rewrites, and make the changes you agree with in your own voice.
Imagine the abuses the Trump administration is making of US surveillance powers. The market intelligence alone must be netting him billions.
I think the idea is that AI itself is going to massively accelerate its own development, and AI with real-world competence is coming very soon. At the rate things are going, it wouldn't suprise me at all if we had mass production of AI-designed systems in the next six months, actually.
I don't think we should assume a millenium puzzle has been solved, yet. Astra showed impressive capacity for cheating when it was faced with impossible cybersecurity challenges. It seems equally plausible at this stage that it's found a bug in Lean.
I'm not a lawyer, but I think the comparison to copyright law is invalid. Such a dispute would be governed by contract law.
Only if you have ready access to the hardware to run the AI models.
Which "elaborate guerrilla advertising campaigns to drive up capital funding interest" were you referring to, in regard to Chinese models not needing to set up message boards for inter-model communication?
You think OpenAI framed themselves for legal vulnerability to Huggingface?
I'd be interested to read more about that.
As far as I can tell, IBM has mostly been putting out junk for twenty years.