Re:Ruby 3.2 preview 1 with support for WASM compilation
by sitkack on Monday April 11, 2022 @01:54PM
(#30992383)
The grand-parent post exhibits feigned confusion and using opinions as arguments. It also proposes an _optimal_ solution that will most likely not get implemented in place of pragmatic solution. We see this kind of argumentation when discussing crypto libraries.
The OP is not _confused_, they just don't like the solution.
The OP is not _confused_, they just don't like the solution.