News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: What are the next internet infra problems? by axg11 on Sunday April 10, 2022 @12:02PM (#30978352)
Could you expand on both of those? They sound really interesting but I'm not sure I understand the issues or use cases.
Re:Ask HN: What are the next internet infra problems? by ng55QPSK on Sunday April 10, 2022 @12:18PM (#30978548)
Provable identity: you get an email, hi i'm a hiring manager from company X, can we get in touch about job Y, could you please send me your (secret) phone number?

It should be possible for you, the receiver of the email, to check if the email originated at company X.

Digital Notary: this came up in several data privacy discussions. You (A) are in contact with B, but you don't want to send B something like a scan of your passport (e.g. for age restricted services). So you disclose the passport scan to Notary and he sends B the message, the passport was disclosed to me and the person is >21.

Re:Ask HN: What are the next internet infra problems? by namibj on Sunday April 10, 2022 @07:43PM (#30982917)
Re: passport scan issue: check out what the German ID card[0] does. It's better than the passport scan sending "state of the art" on both security and privacy.

[0]: https://www.personalausweisportal.de/Webs/PA/EN/home/home-no...

Re:Ask HN: What are the next internet infra problems? by teddyh on Sunday April 10, 2022 @01:58PM (#30979739)
> It should be possible for you, the receiver of the email, to check if the email originated at company X.

You could check the DKIM signature of the email.

Re:Ask HN: What are the next internet infra problems? by na85 on Sunday April 10, 2022 @02:46PM (#30980340)
Exactly. "Did this email originate at $server" is what DKIM and SPF are meant to solve and IME they work well. Setting them up is not particularly difficult and there is a wealth of open documentation about it.
Re:Ask HN: What are the next internet infra problems? by 0xCMP on Sunday April 10, 2022 @03:31PM (#30980822)
The point is "proving" something without showing them the proof. E.g. someone Company X trusts looks at the documents or etc and sends a signed confirmation that they confirm X, Y, and Z about Person A.

The point being that Company X does not have a copy of the sensitive information (and neither the liability of losing it) and the Digital Notary would (in theory) have better procedures for properly deleting or storing the data as needed.