Would you encourage the same policy of not naming the the accused parties with the #meToo movement? Because it's not productive or worthwhile to focus on a few individuals? And where would that movement have gotten if none of the parties involved had ever been named?

The other commenter basically said focusing outrage was not problematic. I don't have any issue with honesty and transparency around hiring practices. However, I do think the appropriate place to do something like that would be on a site like glassdoor, and not a platform like twitter. I think as a country we have way more than enough "outrage" at the moment, I don't see any benefit to adding fuel to fire and communicating it a way that is likely going stir up hashtag vomit.

They deserve the outrage and the outrage is the only thing that's gonna fix this.

Also to answer your question. Literally every single positive change in this country has come out of focused outrage.

Civil rights movement LGBT rights Women's rights The basic amount of worker and consumer rights.

What is being discussed is responsibility for actions.