We analyzed 100K technical interviews to see where the best performers work

Re:We analyzed 100K technical interviews to see where the be... by chewbacha on Thursday March 31, 2022 @12:29PM (#30869120)

Oof, non-zeroed charts are very deceptive in enlarging differences that might be within the error margins.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We analyzed 100K technical interviews to see where the be... by jenoer on Thursday March 31, 2022 @12:51PM (#30869435)

I was curious what one of these would look like as a "regular" chart.

Here's what it looks like: https://imgur.com/a/BkzEoGV

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We analyzed 100K technical interviews to see where the be... by mooreds on Thursday March 31, 2022 @12:52PM (#30869455)

Thanks for that. Still looks significant, but much less striking.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We analyzed 100K technical interviews to see where the be... by drc500free on Friday April 01, 2022 @12:21AM (#30875146)

In this case, is 0% passing really a meaningful bar? You could flip the chart upside-down and do it on fail rates, and the differences would look like this.

[ Parent | on HN ]